Of all the conceptual ÆPT 'meat' (=all essentially earnest concepts) behind the No.1 aim of ÆIMC only one 'muscle' (namely the concEPT/definiiton of Absolute Life Quality) may have some chance to be put to more worthwhile than just mirth inviting use.

​

Aim No. 2 is mere pie in the sky. 

​

Much of the redundantly (and never neatly) written ÆPT take on what is going on was contrived to be expressed as aptly allusive acronyms.

 

However, 3 ÆPT concepts (or concEPTs) are portmanteau terms; and of those "functure" and "actention" are rather self-explanatory. 

​

Not so in case of "ambiadvantageous".

It was contrived en route to build what might be the most integrative and demanding of all the acronymic concEPTs, namely EAVASIVE. 

​

EAVASIVE was arrived at not only by methods such as sem_antics and "abundant error plagued trials" (that is, Mother Nature's own method that Charles Darwin recognised and made famous).

​

In order for me to combat the semantic and grammatical obstacles against arriving at the goal of constructing an acronymic concEPT as implicity explanatory and aptly allusive as EAVASIVE, I resorted to contriving, adopting, and diligently applying a 'Tolerance-Principled' attitude. 

[Perhaps, some recEPTive intercEPTee would be able to find EAVASIVE to be almost as accEPTable a concEPT as I do by adopting this, by W. Heisenberg heralded, attitude?]

​​

Anyhow, I came to agreeable enough philosophical terms with it.

 

"Ambiadvantageous" refers especially to mutations that manifest as adaptive behaviors (and functures) that involve CURSES as an in our recent evolution on balance advantageously motivating, or co-motivating, factor. 

​

Furthermore and finally (for now), the ÆPTly defined and closely related meanings of ambiadvantageous and EAVASIVE are mainly to be understood in context of the emergence (in our recent phylogeny) of our language functions and the recently reported finding that "Human TKTL1 implies greater neurogenesis in frontal neocortex of modern humans than in Neanderthals"

(https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl6422).

​

Our language functions are of course involved in much more than hypnosis (as entertainment or used as a clinical tool). 

 

Taken together, our human languages are a direct consequence of mutations (possibly not very many such) in our recent phylogeny—mutations that combined with and as if leveraged (but to some extent also masked) relatively recent cognitive capabilities that our chimpanzee cousins are in posession of.

 

Some time after our human lineage diverged from that of the chimpanzees, our current cognitive and verbal (≲EAVASIVE) capabilities would have been paved way for by at least one mutation that enabled pointing 👈👉👆👇 as a means of directing the actention of others (what others pay actention to). So, what was enhanced by the novelty (back then) of pointing, was the prior non-verbal cognitive and behavioral capacity to co-operatively exploit opportunities and deal with threats (prevent injuries or deaths). 

​

Mutations that happened in the genetic lineage shared by all primates became stepping stones for mutations that were key to how we humans as of late came to function and behave (in the ways we are uniquely capable of)—including that we far more commonly pay actention and self-regulate EAVASIVEly rather than promote ALQwholesomeness by as far as realistically possible prevent CURSES from being 'put' (incurred).

​​

Of course, the further back in our phylogeny the more accumulated functurally significant genomic changes we have in common with other animals. 

​​

So yes, we have much in common with other animals—especially with other mammals and extra much so with other primates. 

That we do is something that can be appreciated by simple observations by knowing that science has established the fact that successive DNA-recipe changes (that began at the dawn of all life on Earth) laid the ground for all the functures (eventually also cognitive functures followed by verbal functures) responsible for the range of ways we humans are able, and unable, to behave and "pay actention" (i.e. be selectively "conscious" at roughly 3 levels or "lines"). 

​

Apropos which, the possibility of convergent evolutionary developments allows one to surmise that we might also share cognitive functions with cephalopods.

​

The first human-specific lingual functures provided extra means of exploiting environmental opportunities that were present within the extended family group of our EAVASIVEness-pioneering common ancestors. 

​

These mutations were successfully pioneered through the taking of opportunities in context of "sexual selection" — an aspects of natural selection that of course played out as selective sweeps within the extended family group(s) where had occured.

​

How these mutations played out—by making their pioneers attractively impressive to potential mating partners and demotivatingly (dauntingly) impressive to mating rivals—can be easily enough imagined, so I will not 'write a screenplay' about it here.    

​

Only one of the acronymic ÆPT concepts (MAD-inspired concEPTualisations) is nothing but inappropriately allusive looking.

​However, luckily, this very simple and silly-looking (but under the surface seriously meant) concEPT (namely "RAT"-neurons) is nonetheless laughable or mirth-inviting!

​

"RAT-neurons" is also the mildest example of the only 3 (official) examples of "septic" ÆPT (or "sæptic") humor.

 

Although the "septic" and the nicer "antiseptic" sort of ÆPT humor emerged from the same mind as the tongue-in-cheek expression "SEPTIC think tank", the acronym SEPTIC was too frivolously cooked-up (was in order to imply that ÆPT is by earnest intent a science-aligned atheistic enlightenment providing take on what is going on) to be counted as a constituent of concEPTual core of ÆPT.

 

Although "SEPTIC think tank" suits being seen as a septic humored expression, SEPTIC (on its own) is not jocular in the slightest but just an acronym expediently pieced together—frivolously forged as a result of philosophizing facilitating MAD-inspired sem_antics.

 

​

What follows, from here, is the only example of a concEPT that appears to have been conceived in a squeaky clean spirit of antiseptic humor; a concEPT that is a very important component of my mostly anthropocentric, altruism entailing, pertly textualised in parts, ÆPT take on what is going on.  

​

The 'ALQholistic' aspect of ÆPT

The concEPTual ingredient of ÆPT that is least unlikely to become appreciated implemented (and worthwhile) is the thoroughly defined, hard-nosed and subjectivity snubbing concEPT of "Absolute Life Quality" (ALQ).

​

ALQ (or ALQwholeseomeness) is apparently a concEPT—or one such that can easily be claimed to have been—steeped or conceived ('concEPTualised') in a spirit of "antiseptic" humored jocularity.

​

A consequence of the antiseptic-humored aspect of ÆPT is that the most important aim of ÆIMC is to apply "ALQholism encouraging" pedagogical tactics, and to promote an ALQholistic ÆPT attitude to, and understanding of, ourselves. 

 

Ideally (not realistically), the minds of policy-makers are to become intercEPTed and influenced by ÆIMC Internetional Ptd. Lty. (by 'ÆPT insights marketed conspicuously' on the Internet) in order to measurably raise the average degree of human societal ALQwholesomeness.

​

A small but nice side-effect of realising at least something of the anthropocentric aim of (my) ÆIMC would be an elevation of the degree of ALQwholesomeness (≅less ALQ holes) in the brains (neural actention selection serving systems) of the sentient animals that we humans have domesticated and exploit in various ways.

​

There are too many-to-mention examples of callous treatment of sentient non-human animals by individuals of the only fauna capable of calling themselves "folk".😒